top of page

VOL I  |  EST.2025 >>

POWERED   BY    ECOSKILLARTS

The Legacy of the 1861 Police Act: Continuity of Control and Custodial Brutality in India

  • Writer: BerryBeat Team
    BerryBeat Team
  • 4 days ago
  • 3 min read

The Police Act of 1861 was created not to protect Indian citizens but to control them. Drafted in the aftermath of the 1857 uprising, this law established a police force designed to serve colonial interests. It demanded obedience to political authority, used coercion against the poor, and shielded officers from accountability. Though India gained independence in 1947, the Police Act of 1861 remains the backbone of policing in most states, with only minor modifications. This persistence has contributed to ongoing issues of police brutality, custodial deaths, and systemic bias that continue to plague India today.


Eye-level view of a historic police station building in India
Historic police station building in India, symbolizing colonial-era policing

The Colonial Roots of Policing in India


The Police Act of 1861 was a colonial tool designed to suppress dissent and maintain control over a subjugated population. It created a police force that was:


  • Obedient to political rulers rather than citizens

  • Coercive toward the poor and marginalized

  • Protected from public accountability


This structure was never intended to serve justice or protect human rights. Instead, it institutionalized a system where the police acted as enforcers of state power, often at the expense of vulnerable communities.


Even after independence, the Act remained largely unchanged. Many Indian states continue to operate under its provisions or slightly modified versions. This continuity has allowed colonial-era policing practices to persist, contributing to ongoing problems such as custodial brutality and lack of accountability.


The Failure of Police Reform Efforts


In 2006, the Supreme Court of India issued the landmark Prakash Singh judgment police reform, which set out seven binding directives aimed at improving police accountability and independence. These directives included:


  • Establishing fixed tenure for police officers

  • Creating police complaint authorities

  • Separating investigation and law and order functions

  • Ensuring merit-based promotions


Despite the judgment’s clear mandates, no state has fully implemented all the reforms. This failure has allowed systemic issues to continue unchecked.


Custodial Deaths and Police Brutality in India


The consequences of this failure are stark. According to the India NHRC custodial death data, there were 2,739 custodial deaths reported in 2024, with 155 deaths specifically recorded as occurring in police custody. Between 2016 and 2022, India recorded 11,419 custodial deaths, averaging more than five deaths every day. Yet, between 2018 and 2021, not a single police official was convicted for a custodial death.


These numbers reveal a grim reality: custodial deaths and police brutality in India remain widespread and largely unpunished.


Close-up view of a police cell door with rust and peeling paint
Close-up of a police cell door symbolizing harsh conditions and custodial detention

Caste Bias and Systemic Discrimination in Policing


The Status of Policing in India Report 2025 exposed deep-rooted caste and religious biases among police personnel. Many officers hold the belief that certain communities are naturally inclined toward crime. This is not a recent development or an attitudinal drift but a reflection of the ideological foundation laid by the Police Act of 1861.


A 2019 analysis by NCAT found that 60% of deaths in police custody involved individuals from poor and marginalized communities. The stark contrast in treatment is evident: a wealthy individual can file an FIR with ease, often receiving respectful treatment, while a daily wage laborer risks torture or death simply for being suspected of a crime.


Recent Cases Highlighting the Crisis


In June 2025, 27-year-old B. Ajith Kumar died from torture during an illegal police interrogation in Tamil Nadu, suspected of theft. Bihar recorded 19 police custody deaths in 2024-25, nearly double the previous year. Across five years of national data, only one disciplinary action was taken against police personnel.


These cases underscore the urgent need for reform and accountability.


High angle view of a police station entrance with a sign in a rural Indian town
Police station entrance in rural India highlighting the institutional presence of law enforcement

Why Police Accountability Matters


The police station is constitutionally required to protect citizens. Yet, for many poor, Dalit, and Muslim communities, it is the most dangerous place in India. This is not a problem of corruption alone but a continuation of a colonial system designed to control rather than serve.


The persistence of the Police Act of 1861 and the failure to implement the Prakash Singh judgment police reform have allowed police brutality India-wide to continue with impunity. The India custodial deaths 2025 2026 data and the India NHRC custodial death data reveal a system that lacks transparency and accountability.


Reforming this system requires more than legal directives. It demands a fundamental shift in how policing is understood and practiced in India, with a focus on protecting human rights, ensuring justice, and dismantling caste bias.


Moving Forward: The Path to Reform


To address these challenges, India must:


  • Fully implement the Supreme Court’s directives on police reform

  • Establish independent oversight bodies with real power to investigate and punish misconduct

  • Train police officers to eliminate caste and religious bias

  • Improve transparency in custodial death investigations

  • Engage civil society and marginalized communities in policing reforms


Only through sustained political will and public pressure can the legacy of the 1861 Police Act be overcome.



bottom of page